No complication to the affinity, shared opinions or otherwise aside. You each are far more interested in things than in yourselves, immensely clever, writers of overly long lines that are somehow passionate yet breezy--all of which spells charisma in prose, the rarest thing now going.
Why is the existence of Two Things any less likely than the existence of the one or the infinitely many? Especially since the pedantically infinitely many so often reduces naturally into the Two?
No complication to the affinity, shared opinions or otherwise aside. You each are far more interested in things than in yourselves, immensely clever, writers of overly long lines that are somehow passionate yet breezy--all of which spells charisma in prose, the rarest thing now going.
Why is the existence of Two Things any less likely than the existence of the one or the infinitely many? Especially since the pedantically infinitely many so often reduces naturally into the Two?